Nikon S6900 vs Sony W320
93 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
97 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Nikon S6900 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6900 vs Sony W320 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Nikon S6900 and Sony W320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. The image resolution of the S6900 (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S6900 was revealed 5 years later than the W320 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S6900 matches up against the W320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S6900 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6900 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The full galleries are available at Nikon S6900 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Sony W320
| S6900 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 62 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Nikon S6900
| W320 | S6900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S6900 and Sony W320
| S6900 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon S6900 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S6900 provides external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6900 and Sony W320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the S6900 and the W320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S6900 and W320 is 93 and 97 respectively.
Nikon S6900 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S6900 and W320.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon S6900 to give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern S6900 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S6900 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S6900 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Sony |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.3 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lbs) | 117 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $190 | $269 |