Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10
93 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 30-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 183g - 103 x 57 x 27mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S8000 (14MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S8000 was announced 3 years earlier than the XZ-10 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the S8000 grades versus the XZ-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S8000 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S8000 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8000 over the Olympus XZ-10
| S8000 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Nikon S8000
| XZ-10 | S8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 31 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S8000 and Olympus XZ-10
| S8000 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon S8000 offers outside dimensions of 103mm x 57mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the S8000 versus the XZ-10.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S8000 and XZ-10 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizes just by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S8000 and XZ-10.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S8000 to offer you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged S8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8000 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8000 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 30-300mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 183 grams (0.40 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 57 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (3 sec or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $300 | $428 |