Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
![Nikon Coolpix S8000 front Nikon Coolpix S8000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S8000/Nikon-S8000-front.jpg)
![Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VH-410/Olympus-VH-410-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 30-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 183g - 103 x 57 x 27mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S8000 (14MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The S8000 was announced 3 years prior to the VH-410 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the S8000 scores versus the VH-410 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S8000 & Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S8000 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8000 over the Olympus VH-410
S8000 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Nikon S8000
VH-410 | S8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S8000 and Olympus VH-410
S8000 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S8000 provides physical dimensions of 103mm x 57mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the S8000 versus the VH-410.
![Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S8000-vs-Olympus-VH-410-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S8000 and VH-410 is 93 and 95 respectively.
![Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S8000-vs-Olympus-VH-410-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S8000 and VH-410.
As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus VH-410 to deliver greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged S8000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S8000-vs-Olympus-VH-410-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S8000-vs-Olympus-VH-410-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S8000 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S8000 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8000 | Olympus VH-410 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 30-300mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 921k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 183 gr (0.40 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 57 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (3 sec or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $186 |