Nikon S8000 vs Samsung WB800F
93 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Nikon S8000 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 30-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 183g - 103 x 57 x 27mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S8000 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Nikon S8000 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S8000 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S8000 was introduced 3 years prior to the WB800F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the S8000 grades vs the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S8000 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8000 and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S8000 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8000 over the Samsung WB800F
| S8000 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Nikon S8000
| WB800F | S8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | June 2010 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S8000 and Samsung WB800F
| S8000 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Nikon S8000 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S8000 provides outside measurements of 103mm x 57mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S8000 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the S8000 versus the WB800F.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S8000 and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Nikon S8000 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The photograph below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S8000 and WB800F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB800F to render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older S8000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Nikon S8000 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S8000 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8000 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8000 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 30-300mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 183 grams (0.40 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 57 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (3 sec or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $300 |