Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000
93 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
![Nikon Coolpix S800c front Nikon Coolpix S800c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S800c/Nikon-S800c-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus 7000 front Olympus Stylus 7000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-7000/Olympus-7000-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Announced February 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 172g - 96 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 7000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Nikon S800c and Olympus 7000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the S800c (16MP) and 7000 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The S800c was brought out 4 years later than the 7000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the S800c matches up against the 7000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S800c & Olympus Stylus 7000. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S800c Gallery & Olympus 7000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Olympus 7000
S800c | 7000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 50 months |
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 819k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+589k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7000 over the Nikon S800c
7000 | S800c |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S800c and Olympus 7000
S800c | 7000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S800c offers external measurements of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7000 has measurements of 96mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 172 grams (0.38 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S800c and Olympus 7000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the S800c against the 7000.
![Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 size comparison Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S800c-vs-Olympus-Stylus-7000-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S800c and 7000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
![Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 top view buttons comparison Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S800c-vs-Olympus-Stylus-7000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S800c and 7000.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Nikon S800c to provide extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent S800c should have an edge in sensor tech.
![Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 sensor size comparison Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S800c-vs-Olympus-Stylus-7000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S800c-vs-Olympus-Stylus-7000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S800c vs Olympus 7000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus Stylus 7000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus Stylus 7000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju 7000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-02-04 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 50 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 37-260mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 819 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 184g (0.41 lb) | 172g (0.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 56 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 140 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $290 | $280 |