Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
93 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Revealed February 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012

Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Nikon S800c versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the S800c (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The S800c was introduced 13 months later than the TG-820 iHS which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the S800c grades vs the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S800c & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S800c Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
S800c | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Nikon S800c
TG-820 iHS | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 819k | Crisper screen (+211k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S800c and Olympus TG-820 iHS
S800c | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S800c has physical dimensions of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S800c versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the S800c versus the TG-820 iHS.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S800c and TG-820 iHS is 93 and 92 respectively.

Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S800c and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon S800c to give extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer S800c is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-02-04 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 819k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 184 grams (0.41 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 140 images | 220 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $290 | $500 |