Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5
93 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Announced February 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Successor is Olympus TG-6
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Let's look closer at the Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the S800c (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S800c was unveiled 5 years earlier than the TG-5 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S800c matches up against the TG-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S800c & Olympus Tough TG-5. The full galleries are available at Nikon S800c Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Olympus TG-5
| S800c | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 819k | 460k | Clearer screen (+359k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Nikon S800c
| TG-5 | S800c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 | February 2013 | More recent by 52 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon S800c and Olympus TG-5
| S800c | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S800c offers physical measurements of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has sizing of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the S800c compared to the TG-5.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S800c and TG-5 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S800c and TG-5.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Nikon S800c to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older S800c will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-02-04 | 2017-05-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 819k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 184 gr (0.41 lb) | 250 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 140 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $290 | $449 |