Nikon S800c vs Samsung HZ35W
93 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon S800c vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Announced February 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Nikon S800c vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Nikon S800c and Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the S800c (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S800c was revealed 2 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the S800c scores versus the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon S800c vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S800c & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are available at Nikon S800c Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Samsung HZ35W
S800c | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | June 2010 | Newer by 33 months | |
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 819k | 614k | Clearer screen (+205k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Nikon S800c
HZ35W | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S800c and Samsung HZ35W
S800c | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Nikon S800c vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S800c provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S800c and Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the S800c against the HZ35W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S800c and HZ35W is 93 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S800c vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The image underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S800c and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S800c to render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern S800c is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S800c vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S800c vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S800c | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S800c | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called as | - | WB650 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-02-04 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 819k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 184 gr (0.41 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 140 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $290 | $300 |