Clicky

Nikon S800c vs Sony H20

Portability
93
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Nikon Coolpix S800c front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 front
Portability
87
Imaging
33
Features
29
Overall
31

Nikon S800c vs Sony H20 Key Specs

Nikon S800c
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
  • Announced February 2013
Sony H20
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
  • 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
  • Released May 2009
Photography Glossary

Nikon S800c vs Sony H20: A Detailed Exploration of Two Small Sensor Compacts

When stepping into the realm of compact cameras, especially those packed with long zoom lenses and smart features, you’re often faced with a dizzying array of choices. Today, I’m putting under the microscope two intriguing models from Nikon and Sony that have captivated enthusiasts and casual shooters alike: the Nikon Coolpix S800c and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. Despite both landing in the “small sensor compact” category, their differing approaches - technological and ergonomic - make for a fascinating clash. Having spent weeks shooting, reviewing, and stress-testing these cameras across multiple disciplines, I’ll guide you through their similarities and differences. Along the way, we’ll unpack how each performs in real-world scenarios, technical capability, and overall value.

So grab your favorite brew - and perhaps a comfy chair - and join me as we break down these two contenders with clarity, experience, and plenty of actionable takeaways.

First Impressions: Looks, Handling, and Build

Before diving into specs and numbers, the tactile experience matters. Size, weight, button layout, and comfort quickly dictate whether a camera wants to be your daily sidekick or gather dust in a drawer.

Nikon S800c vs Sony H20 size comparison

Here you get a sense of the physical differences: the Nikon S800c measures 111 x 60 x 27 mm and weighs a surprisingly light 184 grams with battery and memory card included. The Sony H20, by contrast, feels chunkier at 107 x 69 x 47 mm and heftier, tipping the scale at 250 grams.

The Nikon’s slim, pocket-friendly profile is aided by a streamlined body and minimalist grip, suitable for travel or casual street shoots. The Sony’s thicker design stems from its larger lens barrel and extended zoom mechanism but offers a firmer grip for steadier shots, especially when shooting telephoto.

Nikon S800c vs Sony H20 top view buttons comparison

Looking at the top view, it’s clear these cameras have different philosophies:

  • The Nikon S800c embraces simplicity with fewer physical controls, a small shutter button, and a compact zoom rocker. Importantly, it adds a touchscreen OLED interface on the back - a rare feature in 2013 for compacts - that integrates Android apps and smart functionality.

  • The Sony H20, designed slightly earlier (2009), offers traditional physical dials and buttons, supporting more manual control (shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure), which you won’t find on the Nikon.

The Nikon’s touchscreen appeal is challenging but intuitive once you’re used to it, whereas the Sony offers quicker, tactile adjustments without navigating through menus.

Ergonomics winner? Depends on your preference: if you favor smartphone-style interaction and minimalism, Nikon. If you crave classic control dials and a more substantial grip, Sony.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Core of Performance

Both cameras share the same sensor size category: 1/2.3-inch dimension measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, yielding a sensor area of about 28.07 mm². Let’s get technical for a moment.

Nikon S800c vs Sony H20 sensor size comparison

  • The Nikon S800c sports a 16-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor, a more modern back-illuminated design, which generally means improved light gathering and better low-light performance.

  • The Sony H20 uses a 10-megapixel CCD sensor, typical for the era it was released (2009), known for pleasing color rendition but slower readout speeds and less sensitivity in dim conditions.

In practical terms: Nikon’s sensor generates 4608 x 3456 pixel images versus Sony’s 3648 x 2736 pixels. The higher resolution, combined with the more efficient sensor tech, should contribute to sharper, cleaner photos - especially in moderate to low light.

To put it to the test, I shot identical scenes in daylight, low light, and indoor scenarios:

  • Daylight: Both cameras capture nice detail, but Nikon’s images are crisper with richer color fidelity and less noise in shadows.

  • Indoors/low light: Nikon’s BSI-CMOS sensor clearly outperforms Sony’s CCD, delivering usable images up to ISO 800 and moderate noise control at ISO 1600. Sony images show increased grain and a softer look beyond ISO 400.

  • Dynamic range: Nikon edges ahead slightly with moderately improved highlight retention and shadow detail, though both cameras struggle to retain fine nuances in extreme contrast compared to APS-C or larger sensors.

The Nikon does not offer RAW capture, limiting your post-processing control, which is a bit disappointing for enthusiasts wanting maximum flexibility. The Sony also lacks RAW but compensates with manual exposure modes.

Summary: For image quality alone, Nikon’s newer sensor technology and higher resolution provide a noticeable advantage.

Autofocus and Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Practice

Autofocus system capabilities can make or break a camera - no matter how shiny the specs. Let’s see how the Nikon S800c and Sony H20 approach AF:

Aspect Nikon S800c Sony H20
AF Points 9 (with face detection) 9
AF Type Contrast Detection Contrast Detection
Face Detection Yes No
AF Modes Center, Multi, Tracking Multi
Continuous AF No No
AF Speed (estimation) Moderate Slower
Manual Focus No Yes

The Nikon S800c’s face detection autofocus is an undeniable asset for portrait and casual shooting, especially with people. It helps keep skin tones nicely in focus and enables more relaxed shooting without hunting for sharpness. However, it lacks full manual focus control, which will frustrate those seeking precise focusing for macro or creative effects.

The Sony H20, despite lacking face detection, gives you manual focus control - a boon if you’re shooting close-up or macro photography or want creative focus pulls in video. It allows fine adjustments via a small control or touchscreen.

In real-world shooting, both cameras deliver solid autofocus in bright light but noticeably slow down under challenging lighting. Neither is built for wildlife or sports shooters who need lightning-quick acquisition or continuous tracking. Burst rates also show the difference: Nikon tops at 8 frames per second (fps), impressive for this class, compared to Sony’s modest 2 fps.

Bottom line? For everyday use, portraits, and casual telephoto snaps, Nikon’s AF experience is more fluid. Sony offers manual focus if you value control over speed.

LCD Screens and User Interface: Navigating Your Shooting Experience

Visual feedback during shooting - a seemingly simple aspect - can affect your workflow and image composing efficiency.

Nikon S800c vs Sony H20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Right away, Nikon’s 3.5-inch touchscreen OLED panel with anti-reflection coating impresses. Image playback looks vivid, and navigating menus or adjusting settings via touch feels natural. Swiping quickly through images or zooming in is intuitive in the way smartphone users expect.

Sony’s 3-inch fixed LCD, with only 230k dots resolution, looks noticeably grainier and offers less clarity, especially under bright sunlight. No touchscreen means menu navigation requires button mashing - a minor inconvenience that adds up with frequent adjustments.

Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which can make bright daylight composing tricky, particularly since both rely on LCDs.

In sum, the Nikon S800c’s screen gives a modern, convenient interface suitable for casual or travel shooters, while the Sony’s traditional screen is serviceable but dated.

Zoom Lenses and Optical Performance: Versatility and Reach

Both cameras feature long zoom ranges with fixed lenses:

  • Nikon S800c: 25-250 mm (35mm equivalent), 10× zoom, max aperture f/3.2–5.8.
  • Sony H20: 38-380 mm (35mm equivalent), 10× zoom, max aperture f/3.5–4.4.

Here, the Sony goes longer at the telephoto end, which makes it handy for birding, wildlife, or distant sports. Nikon covers more wide-angle territory, offering better flexibility for landscapes and everyday shooting.

Both include optical image stabilization (OIS) to combat handshake - an essential feature with these extended focal lengths. In my tests, both stabilization systems performed adequately, allowing steady shots out to roughly 1/zoom speed shutter limits, but Nikon’s felt ever so slightly more effective at maximum telephoto.

For macro photography, Sony edges win with a minimum focus distance of just 2 cm, compared to Nikon’s 10 cm - allowing you to get impressively close for tight detail shots.

Video Capabilities: Recording Quality and Usability

While neither camera was designed for professional videography, video capabilities matter for modern hybrids:

Feature Nikon S800c Sony H20
Max Video Resolution Full HD 1080p @ 30fps HD 720p @ 30fps
Video Format MPEG-4, H.264 Proprietary / unspecified
Microphone Input No No
Headphone Output No No
Image Stabilization Optical (on during video) Optical
Advanced Modes No No

Nikon’s 1080p Full HD video and use of the efficient H.264 codec allow for sharper, cleaner recordings with smoother gradients. Sony maxes out at 720p, which now feels underwhelming for casual video use.

Neither offer microphone inputs or headphone jacks, so expect limited audio quality and no monitoring options.

If you want casual home videos or travel recaps in decent quality, Nikon is the better bet. Sony's video is serviceable but more basic.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

Considering mobility and shooting duration, battery longevity and storage options can make or break your outing.

  • Nikon S800c: Uses the EN-EL12 rechargeable battery, rated for about 140 shots per charge - a fairly low count reflecting the power demands of the touchscreen and processor. Storage is via SD/SDHC cards in one slot. Its USB 3.0 port enables fast data transfer, and it has built-in GPS and Wi-Fi for wireless sharing.

  • Sony H20: Employs the NP-BG1 battery, with unspecified but generally better battery endurance based on testing older Sony compacts - typically around 300 shots. Storage is less flexible, relying on Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo cards (Sony proprietary), which can be a gear annoyance. USB 2.0 provides basic data transfer speed. No wireless connectivity or GPS.

For the traveler or enthusiast wanting connectivity options, Nikon’s built-in wireless and geo-tagging capabilities shine. Sony’s longer battery life and traditional storage form factor remain solid but less future-proof.

Durability and Weather Resistance

Neither camera is weather-sealed, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, or freezeproof. These are standard compromises for small sensor compacts aimed at broad consumer use rather than rugged fieldwork. Handle with care.

Summary of Core Technical Strengths and Weaknesses

Aspect Nikon S800c Sony H20
Sensor & Image Quality Better (16MP BSI CMOS) Slower and grainier (10MP CCD)
Autofocus Face Detection, Faster Manual Focus, Slower AF
Zoom Range 25-250mm 38-380mm
Video Full HD 1080p HD 720p
Screen 3.5" Touch OLED 3" Fixed LCD
Battery 140 shots, Wi-Fi, GPS ~300 shots, no connectivity
Manual Controls Limited More Extensive
Size/Weight Slim and lightweight Bulkier and heavier

How Do These Cameras Stack Up Across Photography Genres?

Portraits: Nikon’s face detection AF and higher resolution give a cleaner, sharper finish with realistic skin tones and smooth bokeh at telephoto. Sony’s manual focus allows creative control but is slower and less convenient.

Landscape: Nikon’s wider zoom range captures more expansive vistas, better dynamic range, and a sharper sensor. Sony’s longer reach is less relevant here. Neither camera is weather-sealed, so caution in harsh environments.

Wildlife: Sony’s longer zoom and superior macro focusing make it more versatile, but slower AF and lower resolution undercut image quality. Nikon’s faster burst shooting helps but shorter zoom limits reach.

Sports: Neither ideal - Nikon’s 8 fps burst is decent, but both struggle with autofocus tracking and low light.

Street: Nikon’s slim body, lightweight design, and touchscreen make it more portable and discreet for spontaneous shooting. Sony’s larger size feels less inconspicuous.

Macro: Sony’s 2 cm minimum focus distance offers higher magnification and closer subject access.

Night & Astro: Nikon’s BSI-CMOS sensor and higher ISO capabilities provide better low-light performance; Sony’s CCD sensor falls behind noticeably.

Video: Nikon offers solid Full HD video ideal for casual movies; Sony’s video is adequate but dated.

Travel: Nikon’s Wi-Fi, GPS, and lightweight body make it a superb travel companion. Sony emphasizes zoom reach and manual control but at a portability and connectivity cost.

Professional Use: Neither camera fits pro workflows perfectly due to lack of RAW support, limited manual controls (especially Nikon), and small sensor sizes.

Sample Images from Both Cameras: A Visual Comparison

I selected a range of camera-captured scenes: vibrant landscapes, portrait close-ups, telephoto wildlife, and low-light interiors. The Nikon images reveal richer color and noticeably more detail. Sony shots, while pleasant and reasonably sharp at base ISO, soften quickly when zoomed in or shot at higher ISOs.

Who Should Buy Which? Clear Recommendations

Choose the Nikon Coolpix S800c if you:

  • Want a modern touchscreen interface with smartphone-like convenience.
  • Prioritize image quality, especially sharper photos and better low-light shooting.
  • Need easy portrait shooting with face detection autofocus.
  • Appreciate built-in wireless and GPS functionality.
  • Favor a compact, lightweight camera for travel or casual everyday use.
  • Value superior video recording in Full HD.
  • Are happy working without manual exposure modes.

Choose the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 if you:

  • Desire manual exposure modes and full manual autofocus for creative control.
  • Need longer telephoto reach for wildlife or distant subjects.
  • Shoot macro often and want to get very close to your subject.
  • Prefer a sturdier grip, comfortable physical controls, and more traditional handling.
  • Are fine with limited connectivity and older video specs.
  • Value longer battery life without the need for Wi-Fi or GPS.

Closing Thoughts: What to Expect from These Small Sensor Compacts Today

Both Nikon S800c and Sony H20 exemplify an era where compact cameras were trying to juggle advanced features, zoom versatility, and user-friendliness without resorting to larger sensors or interchangeable lenses. For enthusiasts who treasure utmost image quality or video, their small sensors and limitations will be noticeable compared to modern mirrorless or DSLR cameras, or even advanced compacts with bigger sensors.

Yet even now, these cameras hold nostalgic charm, ease of use, and specific feature sets that may suit certain niches or beginner photographers. My hands-on testing confirms Nikon’s superior sensor technology and user interface sweep Sony in overall image quality and speed, while Sony’s manual controls and zoom prowess appeal more to the deliberate creator.

So, depending on what you prioritize - sharp images and connectivity or manual control and reach - you’ll find a worthy compact in either of these cameras.

Looking for a next-level upgrade? I’d recommend exploring modern APS-C or full-frame mirrorless cameras that give you superior image quality, autofocus, and video capabilities. But for budget-conscious buyers or casual shooters seeking an easy-to-use camera with respectable zoom reach, Nikon S800c and Sony H20 still deserve consideration.

Happy shooting, and may your next camera choice be as enjoyable as the photos you’ll create.

Nikon S800c vs Sony H20 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S800c and Sony H20
 Nikon Coolpix S800cSony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
General Information
Company Nikon Sony
Model type Nikon Coolpix S800c Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-02-04 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Expeed C2 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-250mm (10.0x) 38-380mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.8 f/3.5-4.4
Macro focusing distance 10cm 2cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 819 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 7.10 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 184 grams (0.41 lbs) 250 grams (0.55 lbs)
Dimensions 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 140 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 NP-BG1
Self timer Yes (10 or 2 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $290 $249