Olympus VH-515 vs Olympus VR-320
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus VH-515 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VH-515 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus VH-515 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the VH-515 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VH-515 was revealed 14 months after the VR-320 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the VH-515 grades vs the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VH-515 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VH-515 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus VR-320
| VH-515 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 14 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus VH-515
| VR-320 | VH-515 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Olympus VR-320
| VH-515 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VH-515 has got physical measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus VH-515 versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the VH-515 and the VR-320.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-515 and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The image underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and VR-320.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent VH-515 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-515 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VH-515 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $648 | $179 |