Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900
91 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
![Nikon Coolpix S810c front Nikon Coolpix S810c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S810c/Nikon-S810c-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S9900 front Nikon Coolpix S9900 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S9900/Nikon-S9900-front.jpg)
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 216g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed April 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Nikon S810c versus Nikon S9900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are designed by Nikon. The resolution of the S810c (16MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The S810c was revealed 10 months before the S9900 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S810c scores against the S9900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S810c and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S810c Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S810c over the Nikon S9900
S810c | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Nikon S810c
S9900 | S810c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | April 2014 | Newer by 10 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Nikon S810c and Nikon S9900
S810c | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus |
Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S810c has got outer measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Nikon S9900 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check the Nikon S810c versus Nikon S9900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the S810c compared to the S9900.
![Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 size comparison Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S9900-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S810c and S9900 is 91 and 88 respectively.
![Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 top view buttons comparison Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S9900-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the S810c and S9900.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of photographs although you might want to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged S810c will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
![Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 sensor size comparison Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S9900-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S9900-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S810c vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S810c | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Nikon |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S810c | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-04-10 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-6.3 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,229 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 289g (0.64 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 pictures | 300 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL23 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | microSD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $350 | $300 |