Nikon S810c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43


85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon S810c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 216g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched April 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012

Nikon S810c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Nikon S810c and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the S810c (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S810c (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") feature different sensor dimensions.

The S810c was revealed 16 months after the XZ-2 iHS making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the S810c grades versus the XZ-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon S810c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S810c and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S810c Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S810c over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S810c | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2014 | ![]() | December 2012 | Newer by 16 months |
Display dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+309k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S810c
XZ-2 iHS | S810c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Nikon S810c and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S810c | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Nikon S810c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S810c provides outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Nikon S810c and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the S810c vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S810c and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.

Nikon S810c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S810c and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S810c having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Nikon S810c will offer you extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger S810c should have an edge in sensor tech.

Nikon S810c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S810c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S810c | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S810c | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-04-10 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.3 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,229 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 shots | 340 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL23 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | microSD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $350 | $450 |