Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also referred to as X-925
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S8200 was released 2 years after the FE-4000 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the S8200 matches up versus the FE-4000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Olympus FE-4000. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus FE-4000
| S8200 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 961k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Nikon S8200
| FE-4000 | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus FE-4000
| S8200 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S8200 offers exterior dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the S8200 against the FE-4000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and FE-4000 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S8200 and FE-4000.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Nikon S8200 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer S8200 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Also called | - | X-925 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-08-24 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 961k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lbs) | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $130 |