Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Nikon S8200 and Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S8200 was introduced 2 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the S8200 grades against the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8200 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S8200 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| S8200 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 961k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Nikon S8200
| SP-565UZ | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| S8200 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S8200 comes with physical measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S8200 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the S8200 vs the SP-565UZ.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S8200 and SP-565UZ is 91 and 72 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the S8200 and SP-565UZ.
Clearly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Nikon S8200 to offer you extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger S8200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 961 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 gr (0.47 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $400 |