Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
69 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Older Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-610UZ
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S8200 was introduced 19 months later than the SP-600 UZ which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the S8200 matches up versus the SP-600 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| S8200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 19 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 961k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Nikon S8200
| SP-600 UZ | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
| S8200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S8200 has exterior dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus SP-600 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the S8200 compared to the SP-600 UZ.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S8200 and SP-600 UZ is 91 and 69 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S8200 and SP-600 UZ.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S8200 to offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger S8200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-08-24 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 961 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 213g (0.47 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $189 |