Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 550WP
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also referred to as mju 550WP
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 550WP Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus 550WP, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and 550WP (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S8200 was released 2 years after the 550WP which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the S8200 matches up vs the 550WP in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 550WP Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Olympus Stylus 550WP. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Olympus 550WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus 550WP
| S8200 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 32 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 961k | 230k | Clearer screen (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Nikon S8200
| 550WP | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus 550WP
| S8200 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S8200 features physical dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus 550WP has specifications of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus 550WP in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the S8200 against the 550WP.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the S8200 and 550WP is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The picture below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S8200 and 550WP.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Nikon S8200 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher S8200 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
| Also referred to as | - | mju 550WP |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 961k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 gr (0.47 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $399 |