Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 9000
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus 9000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S8200 was introduced 2 years after the 9000 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the S8200 matches up against the 9000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus 9000
| S8200 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2011 | May 2009 | More modern by 28 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 961k | 230k | Clearer screen (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Nikon S8200
| 9000 | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus 9000
| S8200 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon S8200 features external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the S8200 against the 9000.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the S8200 and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S8200 and 9000.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Nikon S8200 to resolve greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger S8200 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Alternate name | - | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 961 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213g (0.47 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $329 | $300 |