Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SH-2
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus SH-2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S8200 was announced 4 years before the SH-2 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the S8200 scores vs the SH-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus SH-2
| S8200 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 961k | 460k | Clearer display (+501k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Nikon S8200
| SH-2 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2015 | August 2011 | More recent by 43 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus SH-2
| S8200 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon S8200 offers outer dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus SH-2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the S8200 vs the SH-2.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S8200 and SH-2 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The visual here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S8200 and SH-2.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of images but you have to consider the age of the products into consideration. The older S8200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2015-03-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 961k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213g (0.47 pounds) | 271g (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | 380 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $329 | $399 |