Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and 6010 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S8200 was released 2 years later than the 6010 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the S8200 scores against the 6010 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S8200 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery and Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus 6010
| S8200 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 26 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 961k | 230k | Sharper screen (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Nikon S8200
| 6010 | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus 6010
| S8200 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S8200 has outer dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus 6010 has measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the S8200 and the 6010.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S8200 and 6010 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S8200 and 6010.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S8200 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger S8200 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6010 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-08-24 | 2009-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 961k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 1/4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 213g (0.47 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50C |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $329 | $0 |