Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 8000
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Nikon S8200 and Olympus 8000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S8200 was introduced 2 years later than the 8000 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the S8200 matches up against the 8000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S8200 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S8200 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus 8000
| S8200 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 27 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 961k | 230k | Sharper display (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Nikon S8200
| 8000 | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus 8000
| S8200 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S8200 comes with outer measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8000 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S8200 and Olympus 8000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the S8200 compared to the 8000.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S8200 and 8000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S8200 and 8000.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Nikon S8200 to result in extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent S8200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-08-24 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 961k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 pounds) | 182 grams (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $329 | $380 |