Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-10
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Nikon S8200 and Olympus XZ-10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S8200 was announced 17 months earlier than the XZ-10 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S8200 grades against the XZ-10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus XZ-10
| S8200 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 961k | 920k | Clearer screen (+41k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Nikon S8200
| XZ-10 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | August 2011 | More modern by 17 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus XZ-10
| S8200 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon S8200 has external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S8200 and Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the S8200 compared to the XZ-10.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and XZ-10 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S8200 and XZ-10.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon S8200 to give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged S8200 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 961k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 213g (0.47 lb) | 221g (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $329 | $428 |