Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S8200 was brought out 16 months earlier than the TG-830 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S8200 scores versus the TG-830 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8200 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| S8200 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 961k | 460k | Clearer display (+501k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Nikon S8200
| TG-830 iHS | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | August 2011 | More recent by 16 months |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| S8200 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S8200 features external measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the S8200 versus the TG-830 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and TG-830 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S8200 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs however you would want to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The older S8200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 961 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 gr (0.47 pounds) | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $329 | $0 |