Clicky

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
47
Overall
42
Nikon Coolpix S8200 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon S8200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
  • Released August 2011
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The S8200 was revealed 2 months after the VR-320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the S8200 scores vs the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus VR-320

 S8200 VR-320 
Manually focus More precise focus
Display resolution961k230kCrisper display (+731k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S8200

 VR-320 S8200 

Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus VR-320

 S8200 VR-320 
AnnouncedAugust 2011July 2011Same generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon S8200 has got outside dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the S8200 vs the VR-320.

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The picture below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S8200 and VR-320.

All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Nikon S8200 to provide you with more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively.

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S8200 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography factors
40
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
33
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Nikon S8200 Street photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Street photography factors
65
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus by touch
lighter than others (213 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Nikon S8200 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
41
amazing zoom range (25-350mm 14.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (6.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (250 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Nikon S8200 Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
68
lighter than others (213 grams)
supports focus by touch
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
great reach (350mm)
no Timelapse mode
bad battery pack (250 CIPA)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
70
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon S8200
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
45
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
bad battery pack (250 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
42
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S8200 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging information
34
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (213 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no microphone socket
32
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than competitors (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S8200 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix S8200Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon Coolpix S8200 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-08-24 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Expeed C2 TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-350mm (14.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 961k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 6.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 213 grams (0.47 pounds) 158 grams (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 250 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL12 LI-42B
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $329 $179