Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42


85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S8200 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizing.

The S8200 was revealed 16 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the S8200 scores against the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S8200 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 961k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+41k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S8200
XZ-2 iHS | S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 16 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S8200 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S8200 comes with outside dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the S8200 vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S8200 and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S8200 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S8200 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Nikon S8200 will deliver more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older S8200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S8200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 961k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 213g (0.47 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 images | 340 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $329 | $450 |