Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and ZR1 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S8200 was brought out 2 years later than the ZR1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the S8200 grades versus the ZR1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Panasonic ZR1
| S8200 | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 26 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 961k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Nikon S8200
| ZR1 | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Panasonic ZR1
| S8200 | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S8200 enjoys outer dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR1 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the S8200 versus the ZR1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and ZR1 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The visual here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S8200 and ZR1.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon S8200 to show more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern S8200 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 961 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $329 | $280 |