Nikon S8200 vs Pentax MX-1
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Nikon S8200 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
Photography Glossary Nikon S8200 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Nikon S8200 versus Pentax MX-1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Pentax. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the S8200 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S8200 was introduced 22 months before the MX-1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the S8200 scores against the MX-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S8200 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S8200 and Pentax MX-1. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S8200 Gallery and Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Pentax MX-1
| S8200 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 961k | 920k | Crisper screen (+41k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Nikon S8200
| MX-1 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 | August 2011 | Newer by 22 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Pentax MX-1
| S8200 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon S8200 comes with external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S8200 versus Pentax MX-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the S8200 against the MX-1.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and MX-1 is 91 and 84 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The pic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S8200 and MX-1.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S8200 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Nikon S8200 will deliver greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S8200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Nikon S8200 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S8200 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Pentax |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 961 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lb) | 391 grams (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | 290 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $400 |