Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-50
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Nikon S8200 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S8200 was revealed 6 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S8200 matches up vs the WG-50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Ricoh WG-50
| S8200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 961k | 230k | Sharper display (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Nikon S8200
| WG-50 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 | August 2011 | More modern by 70 months |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Ricoh WG-50
| S8200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S8200 has got outer dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S8200 and Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the S8200 and the WG-50.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S8200 and WG-50 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S8200 and WG-50.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you can expect similar quality of files although you really should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged S8200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-08-24 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 961 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $329 | $280 |