Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is fairly similar and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S8200 was released 9 years before the WG-70 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S8200 scores against the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Ricoh WG-70
| S8200 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 961k | 230k | Crisper display (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Nikon S8200
| WG-70 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 | August 2011 | More modern by 102 months |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Ricoh WG-70
| S8200 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S8200 offers physical measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the S8200 against the WG-70.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and WG-70 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The pic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S8200 and WG-70.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images though you need to take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged S8200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 961k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | 300 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $329 | $280 |