Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Photography Glossary Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Nikon S8200 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S8200 was introduced 4 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the S8200 matches up versus the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S8200 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S8200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S8200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 961k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+846k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon S8200
| WG-M1 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Ricoh WG-M1
| S8200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S8200 comes with outer measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S8200 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the S8200 versus the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S8200 and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The image below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S8200 and WG-M1.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Nikon S8200 to provide extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged S8200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S8200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-08-24 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 1.5" |
| Display resolution | 961k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 350 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $329 | $2,000 |