Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
![Nikon Coolpix S8200 front Nikon Coolpix S8200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S8200/Nikon-S8200-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB150F/Samsung-WB150F-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The S8200 was released 4 months prior to the WB150F which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the S8200 grades against the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Samsung WB150F. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Samsung WB150F
S8200 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 961k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+501k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Nikon S8200
WB150F | S8200 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Samsung WB150F
S8200 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2012 | Similar age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S8200 enjoys outside measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the S8200 and the WB150F.
![Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S8200-vs-Samsung-WB150F-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S8200 and WB150F is 91 and 93 respectively.
![Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S8200-vs-Samsung-WB150F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S8200 and WB150F.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon S8200 to give more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively.
![Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S8200-vs-Samsung-WB150F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S8200-vs-Samsung-WB150F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Samsung WB150F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 961 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $329 | $230 |