Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB250F
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Nikon S8200 and Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively close and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S8200 was manufactured 16 months earlier than the WB250F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the S8200 grades versus the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Samsung WB250F
| S8200 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 961k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+501k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Nikon S8200
| WB250F | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 16 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Samsung WB250F
| S8200 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S8200 features exterior dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Nikon S8200 and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the S8200 compared to the WB250F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S8200 and WB250F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S8200 and WB250F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Nikon S8200 to render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older S8200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 961 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $250 |