Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S8200 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S8200 was introduced 3 years before the WB35F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the S8200 matches up vs the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Samsung WB35F
| S8200 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 961k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Nikon S8200
| WB35F | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 28 months |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Samsung WB35F
| S8200 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S8200 comes with physical measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the S8200 against the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S8200 and WB35F.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you should always consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged S8200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 961k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 213 gr (0.47 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $329 | $130 |