Nikon S9100 vs Olympus XZ-10
91 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 214g - 105 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched July 2011
- Updated by Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S9100 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Nikon S9100 versus Olympus XZ-10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S9100 (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S9100 was launched 18 months earlier than the XZ-10 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the S9100 scores vs the XZ-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S9100 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9100 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S9100 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9100 over the Olympus XZ-10
| S9100 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Nikon S9100
| XZ-10 | S9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 18 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9100 and Olympus XZ-10
| S9100 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S9100 features outside measurements of 105mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9100 versus Olympus XZ-10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the S9100 versus the XZ-10.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S9100 and XZ-10 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The picture below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S9100 and XZ-10.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files though you should always take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged S9100 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 62 x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $329 | $428 |