Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70
91 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
![Nikon Coolpix S9100 front Nikon Coolpix S9100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100/Nikon-S9100-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-70/Ricoh-WG-70-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 214g - 105 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched July 2011
- Successor is Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Nikon S9100 versus Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the S9100 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The S9100 was introduced 9 years earlier than the WG-70 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S9100 matches up against the WG-70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9100 and Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S9100 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9100 over the Ricoh WG-70
S9100 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Nikon S9100
WG-70 | S9100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 104 months |
Common features in the Nikon S9100 and Ricoh WG-70
S9100 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9100 provides physical measurements of 105mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S9100 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the S9100 against the WG-70.
![Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S9100 and WG-70 is 91 and 91 respectively.
![Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The pic below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S9100 and WG-70.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to render greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S9100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100-vs-Ricoh-WG-70-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 160 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214g (0.47 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 62 x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 images | 300 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $329 | $280 |