Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Nikon S9100
- Later Model is Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the S9300 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S9300 was introduced 5 months earlier than the TG-630 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the S9300 grades versus the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| S9300 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Nikon S9300
| TG-630 iHS | S9300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| S9300 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2012 | January 2013 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S9300 provides external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the S9300 and the TG-630 iHS.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S9300 and TG-630 iHS is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The picture below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S9300 and TG-630 iHS.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Nikon S9300 to deliver extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-07-16 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.9fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | 220 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $249 | $200 |