Clicky

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40
Nikon Coolpix S9300 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
  • Announced July 2012
  • Succeeded the Nikon S9100
  • Successor is Nikon S9500
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S9300 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The S9300 was announced 13 months later than the VR-320 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the S9300 scores against the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

				

Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Olympus VR-320

 S9300 VR-320 
RevealedJuly 2012July 2011Fresher by 13 months
Display resolution921k230kClearer display (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S9300

 VR-320 S9300 

Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Olympus VR-320

 S9300 VR-320 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9300 comes with outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the S9300 against the VR-320.

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9300 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S9300 and VR-320.

As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon S9300 to produce more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern S9300 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon S9300
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
34
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
33
megapixel count decent (14MP)
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Nikon S9300 Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Street photography highlights
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (215g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Nikon S9300 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
47
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (200 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Nikon S9300 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
66
lighter than competitors (215g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
not so great battery (200 per charge)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S9300 Landscape photography features
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography features
41
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
not so great battery (200 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
42
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9300 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging information
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (215 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
missing external mic port
32
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon S9300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S9300 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix S9300Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S9300 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-07-16 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 125 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-450mm (18.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 4cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 921k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 6.9fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 215 gr (0.47 lb) 158 gr (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 LI-42B
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $249 $179