Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FX75
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced July 2012
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9100
- Replacement is Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70

Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon S9300 and Panasonic FX75, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Panasonic. The image resolution of the S9300 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The S9300 was announced 2 years after the FX75 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the S9300 grades against the FX75 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Panasonic FX75
S9300 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Nikon S9300
FX75 | S9300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Panasonic FX75
S9300 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9300 features outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9300 and Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the S9300 compared to the FX75.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the S9300 and FX75 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The image here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S9300 and FX75.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon S9300 to result in more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger S9300 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-07-16 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.9fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lb) | 165 grams (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $249 | $139 |