Nikon S9300 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Nikon S9300 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9100
- Replacement is Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III

Nikon S9300 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Nikon S9300 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the S9300 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the S9300 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses different sensor dimensions.

The S9300 was released 11 months later than the GR Digital IV so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the S9300 scores versus the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Nikon S9300 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
S9300 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Nikon S9300
GR Digital IV | S9300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
S9300 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9300 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9300 offers physical measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9300 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the S9300 and the GR Digital IV.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9300 and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.

Nikon S9300 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S9300 and GR Digital IV.
All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S9300 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Nikon S9300 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger S9300 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Nikon S9300 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9300 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-07-16 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.9fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 pictures | 390 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $249 | $599 |