Nikon S9300 vs Samsung HZ35W
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Released July 2012
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9100
- Replacement is Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is WB650

Nikon S9300 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Nikon S9300 and Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the S9300 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The S9300 was announced 2 years after the HZ35W which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S9300 matches up against the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon S9300 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Samsung HZ35W
S9300 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer display (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Nikon S9300
HZ35W | S9300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Samsung HZ35W
S9300 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon S9300 provides exterior dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9300 and Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the S9300 compared to the HZ35W.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S9300 and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.

Nikon S9300 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9300 and HZ35W.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon S9300 to offer more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher S9300 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Nikon S9300 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9300 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called as | - | WB650 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-07-16 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 921k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.9fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $249 | $300 |