Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
59 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Old Model is Nikon S9100
- Refreshed by Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S9300 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S9300 was announced 18 months prior to the WB2200F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S9300 scores vs the WB2200F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Samsung WB2200F
| S9300 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Nikon S9300
| WB2200F | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | July 2012 | Fresher by 18 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Samsung WB2200F
| S9300 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9300 enjoys external measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the S9300 vs the WB2200F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S9300 and WB2200F is 91 and 59 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S9300 and WB2200F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures but you need to take the age of the products into consideration. The older S9300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-07-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.9 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) | 708 gr (1.56 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $249 | $599 |