Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched July 2012
- Superseded the Nikon S9100
- Successor is Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the S9300 (16MP) and W290 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S9300 was launched 3 years after the W290 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the S9300 scores vs the W290 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Sony W290
| S9300 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2012 | February 2009 | Newer by 42 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Nikon S9300
| W290 | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Sony W290
| S9300 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon S9300 offers exterior dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Sony W290 has specifications of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the S9300 vs the W290.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S9300 and W290 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9300 and W290.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Nikon S9300 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern S9300 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S9300 vs Sony W290 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-07-16 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.9 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $249 | $230 |