Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020
92 Imaging
42 Features
37 Overall
40
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
- Superseded the Nikon S9300
- Updated by Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S9500 was released 3 years later than the FE-5020 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the S9500 scores against the FE-5020 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9500 & Olympus FE-5020. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9500 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Olympus FE-5020
| S9500 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 43 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Nikon S9500
| FE-5020 | S9500 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Olympus FE-5020
| S9500 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9500 offers outer dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5020 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the S9500 versus the FE-5020.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S9500 and FE-5020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the gap between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9500 and FE-5020.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Nikon S9500 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger S9500 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also called | - | X-935 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | OLED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.5 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 137g (0.30 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $230 | $160 |