Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020
92 Imaging
42 Features
37 Overall
40
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Replaced the Nikon S9300
- Successor is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S9500 was unveiled 3 years after the 6020 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the S9500 grades versus the 6020 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9500 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S9500 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Olympus 6020
| S9500 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Nikon S9500
| 6020 | S9500 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Olympus 6020
| S9500 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S9500 comes with physical dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the S9500 and the 6020.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S9500 and 6020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S9500 and 6020.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S9500 to give greater detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher S9500 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Alternate name | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | OLED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.5 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $230 | $279 |