Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VG-160
92 Imaging
42 Features
37 Overall
40
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
- Old Model is Nikon S9300
- Successor is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VG-160, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and VG-160 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S9500 was introduced 13 months later than the VG-160 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the S9500 matches up versus the VG-160 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9500 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S9500 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Olympus VG-160
| S9500 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2012 | Fresher by 13 months | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Nikon S9500
| VG-160 | S9500 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VG-160
| S9500 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9500 has exterior measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the S9500 versus the VG-160.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S9500 and VG-160 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S9500 and VG-160.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon S9500 to provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer S9500 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | OLED monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | 165 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $230 | $90 |