Nikon S9500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
41 Features
37 Overall
39
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
- Superseded the Nikon S9300
- Updated by Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Nikon S9500 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S9500 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S9500 was revealed 2 months later than the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the S9500 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S9500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9500 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S9500 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S9500 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S9500
| XZ-2 iHS | S9500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S9500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | December 2012 | Same age | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S9500 has exterior measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S9500 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the S9500 vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9500 and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S9500 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S9500 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Nikon S9500 will result in greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | OLED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.5 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 340 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $230 | $450 |