Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W
92 Imaging
41 Features
37 Overall
39
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Succeeded the Nikon S9300
- Refreshed by Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S9500 was unveiled 3 years after the HZ10W which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the S9500 matches up versus the HZ10W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9500 & Samsung HZ10W. The full galleries are available at Nikon S9500 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Samsung HZ10W
| S9500 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | May 2009 | More modern by 46 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Nikon S9500
| HZ10W | S9500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Samsung HZ10W
| S9500 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9500 provides external measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ10W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the S9500 compared to the HZ10W.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S9500 and HZ10W is 92 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S9500 and HZ10W.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon S9500 to offer you greater detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent S9500 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also called | - | WB500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | OLED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.5fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $230 | $300 |