Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
41 Features
37 Overall
39
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Older Model is Nikon S9300
- Successor is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the S9500 (18MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S9500 was introduced at a similar time to the WB800F and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the S9500 matches up vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9500 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9500 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Samsung WB800F
| S9500 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Nikon S9500
| WB800F | S9500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Samsung WB800F
| S9500 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2013 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9500 provides physical dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the S9500 vs the WB800F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9500 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S9500 and WB800F.
As you can see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Nikon S9500 to give you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively.
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S9500 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Highest Possible resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | OLED monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $230 | $300 |