Nikon S9500 vs Sony HX200V
92 Imaging
42 Features
37 Overall
40


66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Nikon S9500 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9300
- Newer Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Introduced May 2012
- Superseded the Sony HX100V
- Successor is Sony HX300

Nikon S9500 vs Sony HX200V Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Nikon S9500 and Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the S9500 (18MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The S9500 was unveiled 9 months after the HX200V which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Nikon S9500 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S9500 matches up against the HX200V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon S9500 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9500 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The full galleries are available at Nikon S9500 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Sony HX200V
S9500 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | Newer by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Nikon S9500
HX200V | S9500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Sony HX200V
S9500 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9500 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S9500 provides physical dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has specifications of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S9500 and Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the S9500 against the HX200V.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9500 and HX200V is 92 and 66 respectively.

Nikon S9500 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S9500 and HX200V.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you may want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more recent S9500 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Nikon S9500 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9500 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Sony |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 99 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | OLED monitor | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.5 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.40 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 583 grams (1.29 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | 450 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $230 | $480 |