Nikon S9700 vs Olympus 6000
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Succeeded the Nikon S9500
- Replacement is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6000
Photography Glossary Nikon S9700 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Nikon S9700 versus Olympus 6000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S9700 (16MP) and 6000 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9700 was revealed 4 years after the 6000 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the S9700 matches up against the 6000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9700 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The full galleries are available at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Olympus 6000
| S9700 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 57 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Nikon S9700
| 6000 | S9700 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Olympus 6000
| S9700 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9700 provides outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has proportions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S9700 versus Olympus 6000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the S9700 vs the 6000.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9700 and 6000 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S9700 and 6000.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Nikon S9700 to give you extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent S9700 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-07 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 50 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $259 |