Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff07/7ff0788d76e3c926f9e9c195b075bf6cf4318734" alt="Nikon Coolpix S9700 front Nikon Coolpix S9700 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Launched February 2014
- Old Model is Nikon S9500
- Renewed by Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Nikon S9700 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the S9700 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The S9700 was launched 2 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the S9700 scores vs the TG-820 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
S9700 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Nikon S9700
TG-820 iHS | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+109k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
S9700 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9700 features physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9700 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the S9700 against the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0084/b0084830634cfa83468761744ed194a7f193aacb" alt="Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and TG-820 iHS is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbdca/dbdca46b60a8947ca38de3429b1a8095892d4faa" alt="Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S9700 and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S9700 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern S9700 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb796/bb796185ffcc0630bf6953727f3a6f2d1d55c47e" alt="Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49778/49778c686319d12d21d59ec3414d8079edece22a" alt="Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2014-02-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 1,030k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $350 | $500 |